Shopping again- need updated advice

hkc

Active member
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I purchased a Sundance Edison in 2013 and just sold my house...and the Edison with it. Buyers really wanted it so I agreed to include it. While I loved the Edison and used a few times a week year-round, I did have some criticisms. It was my first hot tub and I did many wet-tests and lots of research before buying. But owning one is a different thing. I was a little disappointed that some of the colors on the lights stopped working after 2 years and some of the jet covers kept popping out. The lid was also getting waterlogged, although I do understand that this happens I thought 4 years was a little soon.

So I'm back to research. I wet-tested a Sundance Optima and Chelsee and much preferred the Chelsee. It's got a lot more power than the edison and is slightly bigger while not being too big. Right now that's the top of my list. It's the same dealer I went to before and I liked them. They have a floor model for $9899 but it's not really the colors that I want and it has the stereo system and I'd prefer not to have that (seems like asking for problems).

I'm also testing a Jacuzzi J-345 (quoted $8899) and a bullfrog R7 (quoted $10,400). Last time around Jacuzzi was the higher-priced tub but that seems to have changed and I understand they are now owned by the same company. Could someone on here comment about that? Did Jacuzzi have some trouble? Is it still a good brand? I get a little nervous when the list price is about $3500 over what the offered "deal" is. I'm interested in testing the Bullfrog as I hadn't tested them the last time 'round.

Any advice on any of those model would be appreciated.


 
Jacuzzi, Sundance, D1, Thermal Spa and now Hydropool and Lazyboy all the same manufacturer.  Jacuzzi and Sundance were when you bought your Edison also.
 
Wet tested all three. I love the bullfrog a8, but it's a little more than I want to spend and they are not offering any deals on price or financing. The Sundance Chelsee is my second choice. Less cash and 0% financing for 18 months, which makes it even more attractive. Jacuzzi was not doing it for me, although the price was right. So now it's trying to either justify spending a few thousand more for the bullfrog or just going with the Sundance. It's a $3k difference, which is tough to justify. But damn I liked those jet packs... decisions, decisions.
 
hkc said:
Wet tested all three. I love the bullfrog a8, but it's a little more than I want to spend and they are not offering any deals on price or financing. The Sundance Chelsee is my second choice. Less cash and 0% financing for 18 months, which makes it even more attractive. Jacuzzi was not doing it for me, although the price was right. So now it's trying to either justify spending a few thousand more for the bullfrog or just going with the Sundance. It's a $3k difference, which is tough to justify. But damn I liked those jet packs... decisions, decisions.

Tell us why you like the jet pacs?
 
I liked the jet packs because I liked being able to switch out the different feeling jets with different depths. The tub I tested had 2 deeper seats and two shallower seats and the one jetpack felt completely different depending on the depth. I liked both depths for different reasons. I like the ability to change things up and its a simple process. It solves one of my major complaints about hot tubs- that there tends to be one "good seat" and then you only use that one. Like I said, I've had a hot tub for 4 years now and I seem to always sit in the same seat. It's not because those jets are my favorite- it's because the depth is. So if I could enjoy all the jets at the same depth I would. I'd like some variety and the Bullfrog is the only hot tub that addresses that. I'm kind of surprised that nobody else seems to do that.



 
I tend to move my jetpaks as I like the lounger as it is the only seat that has jets for my legs and feet.  The other seats concentrate on my back.  I personally do not find a lot difference with the depth on the other seats.  I have a R6L.  Good luck with your decision!
 
hkc said:
I liked the jet packs because I liked being able to switch out the different feeling jets with different depths. The tub I tested had 2 deeper seats and two shallower seats and the one jetpack felt completely different depending on the depth. I liked both depths for different reasons. I like the ability to change things up and its a simple process. It solves one of my major complaints about hot tubs- that there tends to be one "good seat" and then you only use that one. Like I said, I've had a hot tub for 4 years now and I seem to always sit in the same seat. It's not because those jets are my favorite- it's because the depth is. So if I could enjoy all the jets at the same depth I would. I'd like some variety and the Bullfrog is the only hot tub that addresses that. I'm kind of surprised that nobody else seems to do that.

JetPaks flat out rock, I was in the R8 the other night, rotated between 3 different seat heights and almost 6 different JetPaks, hit all the right spots! Such an awesome design
 
Still on the fence. Is 9800 a good price for a sundance chelsee? It's a lot more than my Edison was for slightly better jets and pressure. I'm torn. I don't think the bullfrog is in the running anymore. I can't justify the expense.
 
Back
Top