Welcome to our forum.
I was recently in a dealer who carried only full foam tubs and he was saying that the cheaper ones are thermopannel and the LIPA (Long Island Power Authority) has tested the full foam and showed they are very very energy efficient. I thought the thermopannel were effficent too until he told me he raw hard data.Just wondering if anyone else had any thoughts. FYI the spa I also saw did not have an air blower. I personally would really miss it.
The truth:1. Heat rises. It finds the path of least resistance to escape.2. In an average climate you loose 90% of you heat through the cover (or where the cover meets the spa)
Sure sounds good. Unfortunately, it is completely wrong. If you take a poorly insulated tub and put a great cover on it, you will still pay a fortune to keep it hot. 8-)
So the study that shows that in an average climate (Southern California to be exact) you loose 90% of your heat through the cover or where the cover meets the spa. Are you saying that is incorrect.
I suggest pouring a tall drink, get a snack, find your most comfy chair (although you didn't sit in it prior to buying it ) and search the PAGES of debate on this subject over the past 5 years on here benalexe...nuff said...
Now, as for more heat escaping through the cover compared to the sides of a spa.... well, figure out the R values. The average cover is R-12 - R-14. Put 6" - 10" of full foam insulation around a spa and yeah, way more heat will travel through the thinner cover.