Jacuzzi 100% no by-pass filtration???

[Spatech_tuo]

goarctic,


"chicken and the egg" - as in which came first.  It's a metaphor for things which are virtually impossible to discern what came first.  Surprised you've never heard that one before, it's "older than dirt".

 

Elementary my dear Watson!!

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/

[BauerN]

Now I just have to wait for Steve to rebuke me for commenting on his post....

 

[BauerN]

Elementary my dear Watson!!

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/

NO WAY  

Nice...

Next time I'm stumped with something, I'm asking you.

[Steve]

Now I just have to wait for Steve to rebuke me for commenting on his post....

 

Now now Bauer... don't be sensitive!

It's all good. I certainly didn't imply that Arctic "started" the no-leak sales pitch, rather, they just perfected it and positioned themselves against the big players based largely on that concept. Thanks for clarifying that for me!    If you want to stand out, do something different rather than trying to fit in to the "more insulation, the more efficient your spa will be" sales approach of all the full foam major players in the industry. That in itself was brilliant and continues to be!

No one is slamming anyone here. It's an observation on the unique selling positions of a given manufacturer and how it may or may not appeal to consumers based on THEIR value.

It's a good thread!

Steve

[Gomboman]

Assuming everything is equal between two spas, (same pumps, number of jets etc.) will the bypass spa typically have greater jet pressure compared to the no bypass spa?  

[BauerN]

If everything is truly equal, that includes the inflow to the pump - so, the pressures would be equal.

If the filters are not cared for (a sin in any spa), then the no-bypass system would lose more power (due to restricted flow).  I don't see this as a flaw in the system - because it is caused by operator error.
(Or...as we used to say in heavy construction...a "loose nut behind the wheel".)

So...
if you care for either spa (all things equal) - the jet pressures will be equal.

[In Canada eh]

Elementary my dear Watson!!

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/

This was done in 2006?

I should get credit for it then!!!  I did a philosophy paper on this argument in university in 1984.  

Basically came down to the same answer.  Since the egg is a potential chicken and potentiality preceeds actuality the egg had to have come first.

Easy answer, the only thing was, that I had to drag it out to 1000 words

[Spatech_tuo]

This was done in 2006?

I should get credit for it then!!!  I did a philosophy paper on this argument in university in 1984.  

Basically came down to the same answer.  Since the egg is a potential chicken and potentiality preceeds actuality the egg had to have come first.

Easy answer, the only thing was, that I had to drag it out to 1000 words

It was PUBLISHED in 2006. It was envisioned long before then. In fact I wrote a thesis paper on it in first grade, 1971, so you were just repeating it by 1984.

[In Canada eh]

It was PUBLISHED in 2006. It was envisioned long before then. In fact I wrote a thesis paper on it in first grade, 1971, so you were just repeating it by 1984.

First grade!!!! Darn it

I guess they really isn't such a thing as a original idea

[Saved by Grace]

For me its as simple as God created the chicken and then it laid an egg.
~Fred

[Spatech_tuo]

For me its as simple as God created the chicken and then it laid an egg.
~Fred

Maybe God created the egg and a chicken hatched from it?

[Saved by Grace]

Who would have cared for it to grow up?

[Bonibelle]

So you guys are saying suddenly a fertilized chicken egg appeared and hatched into the first chicken? That would mean that statistically there would have had to be many fertilized chicken eggs that suddenly hatched at the same or relatively same time(chickens don't have real long life spans)...If only one egg hatched...there would not be more eggs or chickens...If many eggs hatched and they were all female, again there wouldn't be any more chickens...same if all male chickens hatched from those eggs...

So it is logical that there was not a chicken first...there were chicken(s) and they produced fertile eggs that resulted in flocks of chickens...Yep, that's how it happened..the end

[Micah]

I think this link is overdue to be transfered to "Beating a dead horse"...or chicken...or whatever...it just needs to go away

[windsurfdog]

[size=12]All right...no "choking the chicken" jokes... 8-)[/b][/size]