Hot Tub Forum
Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: spaman-- on November 11, 2005, 01:49:34 pm
-
I thaught this might shed some light as to why many manufacturers are going to ETL listing instead of continuing the UL label.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NTB/is_19_44/ai_n15680634
sorry you will have to cut and paste the link.
-
thanks spaman, very interesting article.
-
SPA MAN POSTS OLD NEWS (http://www.whatsthebest-hottub.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=wtb-hottub;action=display;num=1128622470;start=0)
-
My appologies I didnt see it the first time and in some research came acrossed it. Atleast I'm not the only one that hasnt seen it which makes it worthy of posting.
-
Spaman, it's a darn good thing that you aren't UL listed...This would be a major violation and we would have to pull that listing. ;)
-
Atleast I'm not the only one that hasnt seen it which makes it worthy of posting.
Well, you can go tell your mom an old joke and make her laugh but that hardly makes you a comedian! Stay on top of things or we're going to revoke your title of Cal Spa Savior.
-
Funny I thought someone else was responsible for companys using ETL cause UL was disowning alot of manufacturers.
-
It is true that it is ultimately a good thing that ETL came along and offers a a viable alternative to UL. The company's are very different UL is a "non profit" company while it ETL is a company for profit. Their procedures are also different when it comes to inspecting a plant. ETL offers a credible alternative to UL. Their reason for coming into existence was to offer company's that no longer wanted to deal with UL a credible way to market and provide consumer confidence in a product. ETL is in no way an innovator as their biggest claim is to stick to UL standards most of the time. But in the end it is a good thing as both seem to keep each other in line.
-
Some news:
http://www.aquamagazine.com/data/archive/AQ-1105-159.pdf
Look on page 163 (5 of 7).
-
Thanks for the article, nice job on keeping us up to date....