Hot Tub Forum

Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: Mike134 on February 17, 2005, 04:16:19 pm

Title: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: Mike134 on February 17, 2005, 04:16:19 pm
I'm looking to buy a Jacuzzi 345 for my place in Upper Michigan where winter temps run to 20 below.  Looked at the underside and see it's foamed with open cell foam and also not foamed totally in like a solid block. What's been people's experience with Jucuzzi's in the cold north woods?  I hear a good tub will only cost $25 a month while a poorly insulated one can be $100 to run.

Thanks in advance
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: LtDan on February 17, 2005, 08:20:37 pm
I have had the 345 since July '04, but Columbus Oh is a far cry from the cold north woods. We have had a pretty cold winter (for us) and while I have not kept a spreadsheet of my electric bill it has not increased appreciably. I keep the tub at 103 and am in it every night for at least one 20 min cycle. It sits on it's own deck 3 feet off the ground so the top of the tub is flush with the existing deck so it is pretty exposed to the elements all around. It seems the totally enclosed bottom does help.

I had to have the light bulb replaced once (it was touching the plastic housing and failed prematurely) and one of the rings that holds in the foot blaster jet reglued, otherwise no problems. I am pleased with the tub.
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: Chas on February 17, 2005, 09:27:03 pm
I sold Jacuzzi over ten years ago, and they had a well-deserved reputation for being energy hogs. I have heard that they have improved greatly since then.

Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: spahappy on February 18, 2005, 02:56:44 am
Quote
I sold Jacuzzi over ten years ago, and they had a well-deserved reputation for being energy hogs. I have heard that they have improved greatly since then.



Energy hogs in Southern California?
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: Chas on February 19, 2005, 11:01:29 pm
Yup. They used to shoot 1/2 pound foam into molds lined with baggies. These pillow-like things were added last, after the tub was complete and ready to ship. No, these were not thermal pane spas, they were just poorly insulated spas.

They had a lot going for them: The jets were amazing, the pluming didn't create any water noise, you could shut off one or more jets - depending on model - to amp up the remainin jets. They had blowers, I'm not a big fan of the things, but these were very quiet and did the job well.

The control systems were all relays at the time, and not very good relays. But they worked well, until the first relay went out. At that time, it was best just to replace the entire wiring harness and all the control relays, because you were going to have to do it sooner or later.

As I said, they have come a long way since then.

One thing hasn't changed - at least in my opinion: they make a very nice-looking tub.
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winterI've had my
Post by: gb60 on February 20, 2005, 12:50:09 am
I've had my j-345 since mid November. I'm in central Massachusetts, and my bill is up $35-$40 from last year. I also am in most every day for one 20 min. cycle. My power company lists KWH/Days. Went from 11 last Jan to 31 this year. You wanna play............
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winterI've had my
Post by: spahappy on February 21, 2005, 12:18:23 am
Quote
I've had my j-345 since mid November. I'm in central Massachusetts, and my bill is up $35-$40 from last year. I also am in most every day for one 20 min. cycle. My power company lists KWH/Days. Went from 11 last Jan to 31 this year. You wanna play............


I would, but I have no idea what you just said ???
Title: Re: Jacuzzi premium 345 in winter
Post by: Brewman on February 21, 2005, 08:18:44 am
If I follow, his daily KWH usage for January was 31 KWH per day, vs 11 KWH per day last January.  If so, then you are using about 630 KWH per month for your spa, which would cost maybe an extra $55 to $60 per month for the spa in January, assuming a cost of about $0.10/kwh.
Brewman