Hot Tub Forum

Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: pinebilly on October 12, 2011, 11:47:05 am

Title: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: pinebilly on October 12, 2011, 11:47:05 am
Hello,

I am buying a used hot tub (2 person solana tx) and I have a question regarding chemicals.  I am not a big fan of chemicals (either bromine or chlorine) and would like to try some alternatives on the market. 

What I am leaning towards are the "natural solution" products.  These are sold at naturalhottub.com.  I hope its not against the forum policy to post a link if so I apologize.  I am brand new to owning a hot and I am aware of a few other products on the market but in reality I am not that educated regarding if there is one or a few that are best and easiest (and WORK) or if people generally dont like them etc.

I was hoping that a few knowledgeable people on the forum could chime in and recommend a few products that they have experience with and like.

FWIW, The tub does not have an ionizer system in it, I will just be using the products.  I will also start by doing a FULL clean of the tub just to make sure I have it clean from the get go.  Also this is a two person tub I think the water capacity is like 150 gallons.  It will just be my wife and I and we are very clean people (shower etc).

Thank you,

Bill

Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: SerjicalStrike on October 12, 2011, 01:05:40 pm
When you use chlorine correctly, you will not be soaking in any noticeable amount of chlorine.  Is there a specific reason why you don't want to use chlorine?
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 12, 2011, 01:36:37 pm
When you use chlorine correctly, you will not be soaking in any noticeable amount of chlorine.  Is there a specific reason why you don't want to use chlorine?

Exactly. Often people think they want to avoid chlorine due to an experience with a public hot tub where they keep a high chlorine ersidual for obvious reasons. The two are not the same, these "natural" ideas (which never seem to actually perform well) are there to fill a void created by not understanding how chlorine works in a personal hot tub where you add it after use, it sanitizes and dissipates quickly before your next usage. I'll measure as much/more chlorine in my just filled bath water than my spa when I get in but you never hear people complain about their bath water causing skin issues.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: pinebilly on October 12, 2011, 01:40:10 pm
Yes, I dont like the smell and how it affects (dries) my skin.  I also have a small child that we have in the tub for short amounts of time and I dont want her exposed to chlorine/bromine.  I am going to go with "the natural" I think.  Basically its either that or Eco One, they seem both very similar.  I find it rather funny/frustrating that a vast majority of people use chemicals (its the year 2011) when they could be using a much more natural solution.  

I dont want to have to take a shower after using the tub, I would rather shower pre or just rinse off and get in, enjoy the soak and get out and not have any chemicals on my body.  Maybe that is just me though (and my family).  It looks like people on the forum are using the natural and eco one mostly.  I would be interested for anyone to chime in with experience of these or other similar products.

Thanks in advance,

Bill
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 12, 2011, 04:31:11 pm
Yes, I dont like the smell and how it affects (dries) my skin.  I also have a small child that we have in the tub for short amounts of time and I dont want her exposed to chlorine/bromine.  

I have 3 boys and if I was worried about them going in the spa due to the chlorine I'd also have to stop them from using the bathtub because if you do it right the spa won't have any more chlorine when you go in it that the bathtub does. Bromine is a different story as it keeps a more constant residual and I don't like using it for that reason but a chlorine-after-use method is great for people who worry about their skin since it dissipates so quickly after being added.

Try the "natural" method that many others go to for unsubstantiated reasons and when it fails as they invariably always do just come back here and we’ll set you straight on how to sanitize with chlorine after each use and have a trouble free, non-chemical smelling but properly sanitized hot tub.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 13, 2011, 01:20:33 pm
I have been a huge fan of Aqua Finesse for customers who ask for products like you do.  Its a product from Europe and gaining alot of steam in the United States, I know very large and reputable dealers all across the United States who swear by it.  It lessens the amount of sanitizer needed and hydrates the skin.  I know a GM for a hot tub company in Nothern Colorado who uses it in her personal spa even though her own store doesnt carry it because they try and keep their customers on one system.

I might add an ozone system to the tub to also help you lessen the amount of sanitizer.

I am never infavor of companies who try and have "natural" sanitizers, but the Aqua Finesse system lowers your sanitizer to such a small dosage your only sanitizing the bacteria and micro-organisms introduced into the water.  I will say in Europe they use the system with ozone and do not use extra sanitizer but I dont recommend going to that extreme.  But the product and 2tsp of dichlor weekly plus 1tsp after use would be plenty clean and would keep your water softer and better smelling then anyother system I am aware of.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: SerjicalStrike on October 13, 2011, 01:52:42 pm
  But the product and 2tsp of dichlor weekly plus 1tsp after use would be plenty clean and would keep your water softer and better smelling then anyother system I am aware of.

If you are doing that, why waste money on a second product besides cholrine?
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 13, 2011, 02:27:28 pm
I have been a huge fan of Aqua Finesse for customers who ask for products like you do.  Its a product from Europe and gaining alot of steam in the United States...


  I will say in Europe they use the system with ozone and do not use extra sanitizer but I dont recommend going to that extreme.  But the product and 2tsp of dichlor weekly plus 1tsp after use would be plenty clean and would keep your water softer and better smelling then anyother system I am aware of.

Why does things in general seem to have more acceptance to many people when its "from Europe"?

Anyway, I applaud you for recognizing that you really need to use a sanitizer with this but with that being true (and it is true) I'd simply use the dichlor as you say and skip the ultra-expensive Aqua Finesse altogether and you'll be fine.

IMO using dichlor + Aqua Finesse is like a doctor telling you to take penicillin and an expensive sugar pill and you'll be fine; I'd skip the sugar pill.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 13, 2011, 04:55:01 pm
I have never used a forum before, so I should probably learn to quote what I am responding to, I will do this later.

First to answer someones statement about why people say "From Europe" as if its a good thing; its a good thing because Europeans generally take better care of their bodies then we do.  They generally care more about their skin and health.

To answer the analogy about taking a sugar pill; without Aqua Finesse you would probably be adding 2-3+ Tablespoons per week which would be 3-4x the amount of Chlorine I recommended.  Depending on use a couple t-spoons would NOT be a proper amount of sanitizer without an additional product like Aqua Finesse.  If you want you could also use Nature II, ozone and spa shock without chlorine at all.  I know a very knowledgable Manager for a large hot tub dealer in San Diego used that system in his own personal hot tub, this was 5 years ago and he still doing the same thing.  Thats actually when I learned about the system was when I sat in his hot tub while visiting the Del Mar Fair.  (One of largest hot tub events in country)

The customer wants a higher quality of water.  ANY customer who comes to me and requests something easier or softer on their skin I recommend this product to every single one...not yet have I had one customer not completely happy to have made the switch.  I also consider myself very well networked in the industry both in Colorado and around the country, and have told friends about it and they seem to be getting great customer feedback.  So why you say its overkill or a waste, maybe you should try it in your own tub?  I dont personally use it in my tub, I know how to treat water and dont feel dry when I get out.

I guess everyone will always have their own opinions of what works and what doesnt, this is a system I know that works and that I would recommend atleast giving a try.  If you dont like it, well the nice thing is you can change to a different system later on right?
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Tman122 on October 13, 2011, 06:07:38 pm
I measured a higher content of chlorine in the city municipal water system than in my tub during my soaks. Always had clear CLEAN water.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 13, 2011, 06:14:31 pm

First to answer someones statement about why people say "From Europe" as if its a good thing; its a good thing because Europeans generally take better care of their bodies then we do.  They generally care more about their skin and health.


Sounds like something they'd say in one of those 30 minute commercials for some type of face/skin care product on TV at 2am. I'm not sure the Euros have all the secrets because if they did they'd have better teeth too.

The customer wants a higher quality of water.  ANY customer who comes to me and requests something easier or softer on their skin I recommend this product to every single one...

Any spa owner that comes to me and says they want to go "chemical free" I explain to them how their fears are misguided and explain the most effective way to go that won't have that "chemical smell" is a simple chlorine routine IMO. Aqua Finesse may be an effective addition to a sanitizer but its WAY too expensive and its not necessary IMO.



I guess everyone will always have their own opinions of what works and what doesnt, this is a system I know that works and that I would recommend atleast giving a try.  If you dont like it, well the nice thing is you can change to a different system later on right?

It may have some benefit and I can understand why dealers would want to cater to customers who are misguided on the use of sanitizers and that it simply is a good revenue generator but I'm not a fan of unnecessary expensive additions to water care. If AF wasn't so expensive I might feel differently. As you say, everyone has their own opinion.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: d00nut on October 13, 2011, 08:00:36 pm
I hate Aqua Finesse... I love Silk Balance...  just saying.

But in all seriousness, Silk & Aqua Finesse are both expensive alternatives, but to a lot of people, they are worth it.  I know I use Silk Balance because it makes the water seem softer for my wife and she enjoys not itching when she exits the hot tub.  However, it does not allow you to stop using an EPA approved Sanitizer. 

To the OP, you need to use something that actually kills all the bacteria.  As I always say, Chlorine is better than Cholera.  I don't have any faith in "Natural" products in killing the bacteria in my spa... if it worked, we'd have a ton of EPA approved natural spa sanitizers.

Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: chem geek on October 14, 2011, 01:31:25 am
The EPA approved sanitizers that pass EPA DIS/TSS-12 (http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/dis_tss_docs/dis-12.htm) are chlorine, bromine, Baquacil/biguanide/PHMB, and for spas only there is also Nature2 with non-chlorine shock (MPS).  So the latter is an "alternative" that is EPA approved and usually needs chlorine only once a week or so to keep the water clear.  It is described as the "Low-Chlorine Recipe" in the Nature2 manual (http://www.nature2.com/files/TL2700_Nature2_Spa_Owners_Manual.pdf).

Both AquaFinesse and SilkBalance have chemicals that claim to disperse and inhibit biofilms.  However, they are not enzymes nor oxidizers so will do nothing to get rid of bather waste.  This means that over time if an oxidizer is not used then one will be soaking in greater and greater amounts of their own sweat and urine (urea, creatinine, ammonia, etc.) as well as dirt, fecal matter, etc.  For best results when using such a system, one should be clean when entering the spa.  Such systems work much better in spas that have ozonators that can oxidize such introduced bather chemicals.  If one wants to oxidize without an ozonator, then one can use non-chlorine shock (MPS) and probably an occasional chlorine dose since MPS doesn't oxidize everything that chlorine does.

Note, however, that these two alternative products are not EPA approved because they do not kill bacteria quickly enough to prevent person-to-person transmission (which does not require biofilm formation, by the way).  In fact, they are not sanitizers at all and do not kill bacteria, inactivate viruses, etc.  They only inhibit/prevent biofilms.  They cannot be used in any commercial/public pool or spa in the U.S. without an EPA-approved sanitizer.  Even in Europe, such systems cannot be used in any commercial/public pool or spa without a fast acting disinfectant such as chlorine.  The German DIN 19643 standard is used with chlorine, but has expensive techniques for minimizing disinfection by-products (mostly coagulation/microflocculation/filtration and chemical removal via activated carbon with subsequent reinjection of chlorine).

The EPA does not regulate what is done in residential pools and spas.  FIFRA rules regulate the claims that can be made on product labeling, literature, websites, etc., but only with regard to efficacy of pathogen kill (i.e. claims of being a pesticide).  Neither AquaFinesse nor SilkBalance make any claims to kill bacteria, inactivate viruses or protozoan oocysts.  The lack of regulations for residential use is similar to that of food preparation procedures in kitchens.  If you want to leave out a chicken on your counter all day in the sun and then cut vegetables in the juices, the government isn't going to stop you or regulate this activity.  However, if you are a commercial kitchen then you must adhere to strict guidelines regarding refrigeration, timeliness of food preparation, cleaning of utensils, dishware and counter surfaces, etc.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Chas on October 16, 2011, 08:02:51 am
Several people have made very good cases for using a simple regimen of chlorine for the very safest water in this thread. I hope you give it a try - do it right, and you will be safer and healthier. Done correctly - I know I'm repeating - you will be soaking in water that is safer and has less chlorine than tap water. I know how inviting it sounds when you hear about 'natural' things, but they seldom work better, or they would be the norm.

You mention that you find it funny that we don't have more or better 'natural' systems in this day and age. Well, as a dealer I find it funny when people walk away from a proven system based on incorrect assumptions. For example, people assume that if you add chlorine to your spa you will be soaking in chlorine. Not true - the chlorine does its job and leaves the scene. People assume that Chlorine is deadly - Not true at the tiny levels used in spa water. Used correctly, chlorine can and does make your soaking safer and healthier. And the powdered chlorine used in a spa can be handled safely with common sense.

Finally - be aware of two things: first, hot water dries skin. It just removes the natural oils. Go take a long hot shower tomorrow morning, or soak in a bathtub with piping hot water, and see.  So if you have found a system for a spa which 'leaves your skin feeling soft and silky,' you are most likely soaking in some sort of oily substance. That will take a toll on your filters, adding cost AND opening the door to serious health problems if you don't replace them often enough. It also tends to load up the plumbing system with various biofilms and/or other things which need to be blasted out with heavy chemicals on a regular basis. For some people who know you don't get 'something for nothing,' the trade-off is worth it. They don't mind buying a new filter more often or running a flush every year or two. But to me, THAT doesn't make sense, nor is it anywhere near the vicinity of 'natural.'

That last point is the main reason we finally gave up selling Baqua products in our store - our customers were clogging up filters every year, and getting nasty build-ups in the heating system (a low-flow system) which had to be cleaned with "Swirl Away" or similar pipe-cleaning chems. Or in several cases, I had to literally snake out lines to scrub the systems clean enough so the chems could finish the job. Switching back to chlorine cleared things up in every case.

As mentioned above, ozone systems and Nature2 cartridges can and do reduce the amount of chlorine you have to use to keep a safe, healthy spa. To me, that's the best of both worlds. And if it makes it more acceptable to you, keep in mind that ozone is all-natural, occurring in nature as ultra-violet rays hit the upper atmosphere, and lower as lightening makes it's way through air.

The main active ingredient in Nature2 carts is silver, in ion form, which also occurs in nature.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 17, 2011, 04:39:53 am
DooNut...how can you possibly like SilkBalance and hate AquaFinesse?  They are made to do the same things.

SpaTech_tuo...try it in your tub if you have one, if you dont have one then try and get a customer on it.  Is it for everyone?  NO, is it more expensive then just chlorine, YES...but is it a way to keep the water softer feeling, allowing you to use LESS chlorine and or other sanitizers, YES.  I am by no means a "soft" type of guy...but I even enjoy sitting in the hot tub with it more.

Chas/Chem Geek-Great posts, that chem geek guy really knows what he is talking about doesnt he?
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 17, 2011, 11:49:38 am
SpaTech_tuo...try it in your tub if you have one, ... is it more expensive then just chlorine, YES...but is it a way to keep the water softer feeling, allowing you to use LESS chlorine and or other sanitizers, YES. 

There is no reason for me to try this because:

1) You admit that it is "more expensive" and that’s fine but in reality it is "much more expensive" than chlorine. For me there has to be some upside to it if I'm dusting off my wallet to buy it.

2) I have NO desire to reduce the amount of chlorine use in my spa. I don't fall for the misguided belief that you should want to reduce your sanitizer use. I'm totally sold on chlorine use. Sanitizes great and when I get in there is a low level of chlorine in the water, just like taking a bath and last I checked people weren't trying to avoid the chlorine in their tap water when using the shower or bathtub.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 17, 2011, 05:56:02 pm
I have also stated lowering chlorine is not its only benefit.  Will you atleast not knock something until you have seen it or used it?

It is more expensive then a 100% chlorine system, but its not much more then Nature II or Baqua.  Steak costs more then a burger but both will get you filled right? 

It softens water, hydrates skin, helps lock in PH, eliminates biofilm build up or growth and doesnt allow calcium to build and will help remove it.  I have seen jets that didnt spin start spinning again.  You can keep knocking it, and I will keep preaching it.  You knock it without knowing about it, I preach it because half way through writing this email I got a call from a customer telling me she loved it and had questions about if they should keep testing PH because its never been off 7.8 in the 6 months they have used it.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 17, 2011, 06:50:15 pm
I have also stated lowering chlorine is not its only benefit.  Will you atleast not knock something until you have seen it or used it?

It is more expensive then a 100% chlorine system, but its not much more then Nature II or Baqua.  Steak costs more then a burger but both will get you filled right?  

I won't be trying it because I simply don't need to use it and see little benefit even if it was almost fee but when I do a cost-value sniff test it just doesn’t fly at all. I have a less expensive, more effective method in chlorine itself. By the way, care to tell us the true and accurate costs are per month or year using AF?

On another post you were knocking an auto-chlorinator because of cost which I found comical in some ways because at least it creates an effective sanitizer while the thing you are adding does not sanitize yet it also adds a great deal of cost. If I'm going to add cost to my sanitizing method I'm going to do it with an auto-chlorinator LONG before I add something to make the water softer while it lightens my wallet.

But as we’ve both said earlier, to each his own.

Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 17, 2011, 07:11:16 pm
Aqua Finesse includes a sanitizer in the kit, so its not like your buying additional chemicals like you would be with the Ace system.  Your about $30.00-40.00 a month on Aqua Finesse depending on size of tub and if you have an ozone system. 

It takes away from time spent maintaining the spa, allows jets and heaters to last longer and allows you to drain and refill less frequently (dont get as high TDS because your putting less substance in).  Is it a good system for YOU "spatech_tuo"...no.  Its probably not a good system for anyone who can professionally treat and maintain water.  But is it a good for the customer who made the thread?  Maybe, im just suggesting they try and see.  Most people who request alternative or better systems understand they will cost more, but they see the benefits.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: woodchopper on October 17, 2011, 08:13:03 pm
When you use chlorine correctly, you will not be soaking in any noticeable amount of chlorine.  Is there a specific reason why you don't want to use chlorine?

Exactly. Often people think they want to avoid chlorine due to an experience with a public hot tub where they keep a high chlorine ersidual for obvious reasons. The two are not the same, these "natural" ideas (which never seem to actually perform well) are there to fill a void created by not understanding how chlorine works in a personal hot tub where you add it after use, it sanitizes and dissipates quickly before your next usage. I'll measure as much/more chlorine in my just filled bath water than my spa when I get in but you never hear people complain about their bath water causing skin issues.
So glad I read this post. I'm hoping to get my spa running again and hope to use chlorine in the future.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Water Boy on October 18, 2011, 10:27:32 am
I'm not here to argue or tell people what to use or not to use, but we too sell the Aqua Finesse, and we have had better feedback on that line of chemical/product than just about anything else we have ever sold. Once people use it, they love it and are hooked and willing to pay the extra money to use it again. From my experience, the people that love it the most are people that have had a spa for a number of years, and were tired of all the "chemical hassle" and they try it and love it, and continue to buy more. I just had a lady last night that told me she absolutely loves the product, and would never use anything else in her spa. I she knows that it is costing her more money each year, but to her it is well worth it. People have sent us random thank you notes telling how much they enjoy their spa all over again after stitching to it.

I will admit that I was skeptical about it at first. I thought it was one of those, to good to be true things, and people would never spend that much money on it. But, boy was I way off. It was the exact opposite. It was actually does what it says it will do, and people are buying it. It has also been a great addition to our pool line up as well.

Last thing I will say, is that for a small local dealer, it is also a great addition to our line up for increased sales. We have exclusive rights to the product, you cant purchase it at a box store, and it isn't sold online any cheaper than we can sell it. You cant say that for Dichlor, bromine, Nature 2. etc..

Anyways, this was not meant to be a infomercial for Aqua Finesse, just thought I would share how much we and our customers love the product.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 18, 2011, 12:12:28 pm
I'm not here to argue or tell people what to use or not to use, but we too sell the Aqua Finesse, and we have had better feedback on that line of chemical/product than just about anything else we have ever sold. Once people use it, they love it and are hooked and willing to pay the extra money to use it again.

If people want to spend that much extra that’s fine but they should not use 1 ounce less sanitizer IMO. It may work fine but I can't see spending an extra $30 to $40/month which equates to $350 to $500 extra per year (I have heard 50% higher estimates but lets go with Mile High's numbers). If people are happy with it and willing to spend the extra $ I won't lose any sleep but I'll keep the extra money myself (and double it in Vegas!!!).
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Tman122 on October 18, 2011, 04:38:27 pm
If people want to spend that much extra that’s fine but they should not use 1 ounce less sanitizer IMO. It may work fine but I can't see spending an extra $30 to $40/month which equates to $350 to $500 extra per year (I have heard 50% higher estimates but lets go with Mile High's numbers). If people are happy with it and willing to spend the extra $ I won't lose any sleep but I'll keep the extra money myself (and double it in Vegas!!!).

500 or more per year over the life of the tub say 5000 bucks. And you still have to use chlorine. Hmmmmmm seems like a no brainer. Add chlorine or add chlorine and 5000 dollars to your water. To each his own.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: d00nut on October 18, 2011, 05:28:27 pm
DooNut...how can you possibly like SilkBalance and hate AquaFinesse?  They are made to do the same things.


You assume they are made of the same things, but unless you can dissect the chemistry of each one, seeing as they both don't tell you what is exactly in the stuff... we can only make assumptions about their chemical content.

But realistically... I love Silk Balance because that's what I sell  ;D
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: MileHighSpaTech on October 18, 2011, 06:50:54 pm
LOL Doonut, and you hate Aqua Finesse because that is what your competitors sell?

You do use less sanitizer because your not fighting biofilm related bacteria and it helps inhibit the growth of bacteria.  The product was made for large water coolers (much larger industry then pool and spa) 

Just like as time goes on you will require more and more chlorine use from when you first owned the spa...that is generally do to biofilm which introduces and produces more bacteria in the spa.  Lets not pretend people take great care of their water...Aqua Finesse lets them be a little more lazy then normal systems.  Maybe the spas I see in the field are different then the ones you see...but when customers are RUINING their hot tubs do to neglect, Aqua Finesse or Silk Balance might be the answer.  I like Aqua Finesse because it costs less, works better and doesnt stain your filters (Yeah I went there! :) )
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 18, 2011, 07:19:16 pm
If people want to spend that much extra that’s fine but they should not use 1 ounce less sanitizer IMO. It may work fine but I can't see spending an extra $30 to $40/month which equates to $350 to $500 extra per year (I have heard 50% higher estimates but lets go with Mile High's numbers). If people are happy with it and willing to spend the extra $ I won't lose any sleep but I'll keep the extra money myself (and double it in Vegas!!!).

500 or more per year over the life of the tub say 5000 bucks. And you still have to use chlorine. Hmmmmmm seems like a no brainer. Add chlorine or add chlorine and 5000 dollars to your water. To each his own.

... yup, and when you look at it over a decade like you're saying rather than just a year it really stands out!
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: chem geek on October 19, 2011, 02:10:26 am
If you are going to use Aqua Finesse, then please make sure you use some kind of sanitizer as well, such as chlorine.  This thread (http://www.poolspaforum.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=3425) is from a user who developed hot tub lung after using Aqua Finesse without using chlorine.  Also, for more heavily used spas, you need to use a sufficient amount of oxidizer if you don't have an ozonator.  Roughly speaking, every person-hour of soaking in a hot (104ºF) tub without an ozonator requires around 3-1/2 teaspoons of Dichlor or 5 fluid ounces of 6% bleach or 7 teaspoons of non-chlorine shock (43% MPS) to oxidize bather waste.  All the talk about Aqua Finesse reducing this oxidizer demand is just bunk.  You add urea, ammonia, creatinine, amino acids and other nitrogenous organics from your sweat and urine and Aqua Finesse doesn't do anything to these chemicals.  Any extra oxidizder/sanitizer demand from biofilms will be well above and beyond this bather load amount, but in a properly sanitized spa (after initial Spa System Flush or equivalent treatment for new spas) there are not significant biofilms anyway.  In general, those people using Aqua Finesse most successfully have an ozonator and use at least some chlorine.

As for the lowest cost, I don't think anything (that is sanitary) beats the Dichlor-then-bleach method since bleach is so inexpensive.  The water will last roughly twice as long between water changes compared to Dichlor-only (because the CYA level doesn't build up with Dichlor-then-bleach).

As for having a powerful pH buffer and keeping Calcium Hardness (CH) low to prevent scaling, one could use a phosphate buffer.  In the Dichlor-then-bleach method, 50 ppm Borates are used as the pH buffer so that a 120-150 ppm CH can be used to prevent foaming.  One key to having the pH not rise so quickly is to keep the Total Alkalinity (TA) low.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Water Boy on October 19, 2011, 11:06:13 am
The Aqua Finesse kits do come with Chlorine as part of the maintenance kit. It even says in the directions to use chlorine.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Spatech_tuo on October 19, 2011, 11:29:06 am
The Aqua Finesse kits do come with Chlorine as part of the maintenance kit. It even says in the directions to use chlorine.

Yes but a few posts earlier MileHigh is saying you will use less sanitizer and that just seems like asking for trouble.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: Water Boy on October 19, 2011, 12:37:11 pm
The Aqua Finesse kits do come with Chlorine as part of the maintenance kit. It even says in the directions to use chlorine.

Yes but a few posts earlier MileHigh is saying you will use less sanitizer and that just seems like asking for trouble.

I can see your point, but someone posted that a lady got hot tub lung or something from not using any chlorine with the Aqua Finesse treatment, and I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that you are still required to use Chlorine with the system per their directions. Yes, you do use less, but still required to use chlorine.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: chem geek on October 20, 2011, 01:29:36 am
... you are still required to use Chlorine with the system per their directions. Yes, you do use less, but still required to use chlorine.

You don't use less chlorine compared to properly maintaining the spa with chlorine alone.  It's only if you don't maintain the spa properly and allow biofilms to form when doing chlorine-only that you could create extra chlorine demand.  That is, Aqua Finesse can insure against improper chlorine maintenance, but it doesn't reduce the amount of chlorine needed to oxidize bather waste because Aqua Finesse does not contain oxidizers or enzymes.  So people who use too little chlorine because of any claims that less chlorine is needed can have that chlorine level get too low.  Those who use the spa more frequently and have an ozonator basically have ozone doing most of the oxidation and is why the people who have had the most success with Aqua Finesse are those that have ozonators.  The proper way to view Aqua Finesse is as an (expensive) increment to a regular chlorine regimen.  If it provides perceived value, then that's fine, but it's not a chlorine substitute nor a chlorine reducer compared to a properly maintained chlorine-only spa.

This long thread discussion (http://www.poolspaforum.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=11142) about Aqua Finesse includes posts from a U.S. representative of the company and some users who like it and some who don't.  There are quite a few other threads and posts on that and other forums.  The claim from the manufacturer of 80% lower chlorine use only occurs when compared to out-of-control chlorine-only spas with biofilm problems or when you don't count the Aqua Finesse Trichlor pucks/tabs as part of the chlorine usage (see the MSDS (http://www.aquafinesseone.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AF_MSDS_SpaTabs_09_2008.pdf) from this page (http://www.aquafinesseone.com/msds-2/) for such spa tabs to see that they are Trichlor).  You can certainly add less chlorine (remember to include the Trichlor tabs in your count of how much chlorine you are adding), but it won't maintain a level if you don't add enough (and don't have an ozonator) with the result of your soaking in your own sweat and urine.  I look at Aqua Finesse in a similar vein as Nature2 in that they are extra-cost insurance to prevent runaway bacterial growth if the sanitizer level gets too low.  Some of the other main benefits can also be accomplished through a combination of Trichlor pucks/tabs in a special slow feeder, baking soda to raise the TA destroyed by the acidity of Trichlor, and a pH buffer such as a phosphate buffer (reduces calcium hardness as well) which minimize the amount of maintenance (though with some side effects like rising CYA).  Or instead of a phosphate buffer one can use a boric acid product such as ProTeam® Gentle Spa (http://www.proteampoolcare.com/index.php/products/spa/gentle-spa/) which also moisturizes and feels silkier, but should be used with a less acidic chlorine source (i.e. Dichlor or bleach).
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: d00nut on October 20, 2011, 01:44:48 pm
LOL Doonut, and you hate Aqua Finesse because that is what your competitors sell?

You do use less sanitizer because your not fighting biofilm related bacteria and it helps inhibit the growth of bacteria.  The product was made for large water coolers (much larger industry then pool and spa) 

Just like as time goes on you will require more and more chlorine use from when you first owned the spa...that is generally do to biofilm which introduces and produces more bacteria in the spa.  Lets not pretend people take great care of their water...Aqua Finesse lets them be a little more lazy then normal systems.  Maybe the spas I see in the field are different then the ones you see...but when customers are RUINING their hot tubs do to neglect, Aqua Finesse or Silk Balance might be the answer.  I like Aqua Finesse because it costs less, works better and doesnt stain your filters (Yeah I went there! :) )

You just contradicted your previous post here.  You say it works better and does not stain your filters... then the ingredients cannot be the same. 

I've personally tried both, and I prefer Silk Balance and that's why I chose to floor that over Aqua Finesse.  Cost is relative to what people think the product is worth to them. 


P.S.  I don't typically tout the ease that comes with Silk Balance, I normal let people know that it will allow them to avoid the drying of their skin, which is what most people want.  I still educate them on proper water maintenance.
Title: Re: Opinions on alternatives to chlorine/bromine
Post by: marky mark on October 21, 2011, 07:58:38 pm
ChemGeek / Spatech_two:
I just bought a tub. 1st one ever. Don't know much about the sanitizing system except what the dealer told me. I use Bromine as that is what they recommended. It is a Sundance Altamar with a Ozonator. I will have my grand kids in it and want to know the best system to use. They are 5 and 6 years old, I keep the temp at 98 when they are in it, but want to be sure I am not exposing them to anything harmful. What do you recommend? I have only had it a few days. Thanks.