Welcome to our forum.
In reading some of the reviews it seems that there are a fair number that are written based only on a wet test....does this seem fair...I do not think that wet testing necessarily gives a enough insight on a spa for a competent review.....any thoughts....
I do not think that wet testing necessarily gives a enough insight on a spa for a competent review.....
I've successfully asked for 2 reviews to be removed because of misdirected content--I think it is up to us to bring these to light to the Terminators so they may review and delete as they deem necessary.
Bully...
I wonder if those happened to be less than glowing reviews of Master Spas?
I wondered the same thing!?
Agreed. I noticed that too when I was reading a review on a Coleman. In fact it seemed more like a bad review of the dealer than the spa itself. Not really appropriate. Bill, can you delete that?
In the spirit of the season and in the spirit of the respect that I have for both of you, tuo and bubba stu, I apologize for being rather firm in the above statements....it is just something that had to be said....and the difference between good hearted fun, like bubba stu's "bully" comment and our running "flimsy cabinet" comments, and the comments quoted above is very evident.(Truce re-enabled)
Windy buddy! I would not trade your commentaries for anyones…..
Anyones Harrrumph.