Welcome to our forum.
HS does not build a strong shell, no fiberglass. They are prone to cracking. I like most everything else about them though.Gary
After reading the many postings here, I was prepared for a surprise during the wet test, and we got it! Turns out we didn't actually love the Envoy with all of us slopping around in it, despite it's fabulous copper color! We found ourselves preferring the bigger and lounge-less Grandee, much to our surprise.
Is it very bad not to test other brands of tubs? (there aren't really many to choose from where we live) We've really enjoyed the folks we've met at the dealership- they were very enthusiastic about our wet test and staying after closing and providing robes, towels, etc. After reading everyone's posts about how important the dealer is (and this one sells nothing but tubs), I am confident that they would take very good care of us!
Now, as delighted as I am about the Energy Efficient rating of the Grandee, I worry about that jet power thing...... is that a non-issue, or has anyone out there been disapointed with the smaller motor/pump system? - E
thanks for the quick feedback!Spatech, I didn't think the tub felt underpowered- more like we were not at all familiar with the controls and didn't know how to maximize the tub's power. It seems that there were two jet buttons, so one or both sides could be powered, and the power certainly felt fine with both sets 'on'. I think that at one point the girls noticed that when one seat's power was increased (by the controls along the tub's edge) there was a decrease in another area, and I wondered if that is a common occurance with most tubs? Is that something that wouldn't happen with larger pumps?Thanks again for being so generous and helpful to yet another newbie! -E
There have been some materials issues in the past, circa 1994/1995 that occurred because the vacumme thermoform stretched the endurol material too thin in some places- particularly in the Jetsetter near the light lens.
However, because of these issues, Watkins took some measures to prevent the material from being stretched to its limits. 1] You'll note that shell designs evolved to incorporate curves with much softer radii, 2] Watkins began using an additional layer of 30# structural foam- which ridgidizes the shell, and 3] Watkins also added supports in areas like the cool down bench, to prevent repetitive material flexing.
Hot Springs (actually, Watkins) has a terrific service and track record
Were they really prone to cracking, HotSpring and Dimension One would hardly be able to afford warranty repair costs of their product.
HS can't fiberglass their shells due to EPA regulations where they are located so they use a high density foam that is not nearly as strong, thus more prone to crack. The cracks are not only problems astehtically, but will leak.
Is that a decent price? Is it very bad not to test other brands of tubs? (there aren't really many to choose from where we live)