Welcome to our forum.
So, if the factory is owned by the employees, that means they are shareholders. And as the company gets bigger, there are more shareholders. Those shareholders want the company to be profitable. So how is that different than other corporations?
I work at a company which was once employee owned. The theory we operated under was that those who share in the success of the company will do more to contribute to that success. It's amazing the difference in how you approach your job when you have a vested interest in the company (other than your paycheck and benefits package).In our case it worked extremely well. Some time ago we were purchased by a large publicly traded corporation and are no longer employee owned.
OK, so it gives the employees more reason to work.Every company I have ever worked for has done that - by simply reminding me that my paycheck was on the line. Based on how well I performed, I got rasies, or got fired.At the management level, do the people running the operation make different decisions because they have to answer to shareholders, as opposed to, well, shareholders?Who is "Wall Street?" I am. I own stock in various companies, so I darn well expect them to perform, or I'll dump the stock. As an employee, do I have that option?Just some thoughts. I hear a lot of 'employee owned' stories, and I guess I just don't get how it makes the company automatically better or worse.